Child Labor

For and against child Labor

Introduction: Child labor is a controversial issue in the present worked. There is much debate in whether children should be used in paid work.

Bangladesh perspective: It is estimated that, in Bangladesh, about 7.5 million children between the ages of 9 to 14 years are engaged in paid work. Most of them are engaged in hazardous work that may cause permanent harm to their body and mind.

Arguments in Favor o child Labor: Some people prefer to engage their children in work. Those who advocate child labor reason that professional work will make their children responsible. They will be able to bring the most needed extra income for their poor families. Besides, being engaged in work from an early age they will acquire experience and professional skill quickly. When the other children start work after completing their studies, the working children will already be skilled and be able to demand higher salary.

Arguments Against Child Lobour: There are certain arguments against child labour. Child age is the time to acquire knowledge. Without education, a child cannot get proficiency in work or reach a high position in the organization. He always remains confined to lower level positions only. Besides, children are not physically and mentally prepared to engage in professional work. Such engagement in work hinders the proper physical and mental growth of children.  Exposure to hardship at such early age destroys their faith and compassion to humankind. They get hardened mentally and do not have any scruple against doing any criminal or heinous act. In developing countries, we find many child laborers get involved in criminal activities. It should also be remembered that children are vulnerable. They cannot protect themselves from danger. As a result, taskmasters make them do extra work. They are also made to get involved in many criminal activities such as smuggling, carrying arms and drug trafficking.

Conclusion: Child age is the age of learning. All children should go to school and get education. Most of the children who are engaged n work are very poor. In Bangladesh, we see that many people do not have any regular employment. They cannot earn their livelihood, live in slums and remain half-fed and even starve. For such people there is no other alternative than to send their children to work as they cannot provide a standard life for their children. The position of those who are against child labor is certainly right. Child age is the age to learn. Only we have to make conducive environment for their learning by helping the children and their families.

Capital Punishment

For and against capital punishment

Introduction: Capital punishment is a controversial matter of the present time. It is a matter of debate whether capital punishment or death penalty should be allowed in modern societies. Many countries have already withdrawn death penalty from their legal systems. Still death penalty is considered an essential part of justice in many countries. There are many people for and against capital punishment. They have strong feelings on this matter.

Arguments against Capital Punishment: People against death penalty argue that death penalty is something irrevocable. We can devoid a man of his life but cannot give life to a man. So, it is not right to take away something that we cannot give life to a man. So, it is not right to take away something that we cannot return. Besides, a man can make mistakes very easily. Saying goes that “To err is human”. Hence, there is every possibility that a judge can make mistake in his judgment and can award death punishment to somebody innocent. It is also argued that no one is perfect. The judgment of a man also changes with the changes of perspective. In a certain perspective, a man may be convicted guilty when in another perspective he may not be judged so. Furthermore, everyone should have a second chance. By giving death sentence, somebody is deprived of his second chance. Such punishment does not allow anybody to correct his mistakes and do penance. It draws an end to every action for a person.

Arguments for Capital Punishment: On the other hand, there are some strong reasons for capital punishment. First, there some offenses that cross the border of forgiveness or endurance. Such crimes shake the foundation of our society and require the utmost punishment. Secondly, if heinous crimes like murder, rape arson, and genocide are allowed in our society and we show mercy to the perpetrators of such crimes by sparing them from death sentence, the wrongdoers will be encouraged to commit such crimes even more. Then crimes of those kinds will go out of control. Thirdly, forgiveness should only go to somebody who deserves it. Showing forgiveness to a person who does not have any respect for other people’s life or fights means encouraging a criminal and conniving in his action. At last, crime has a contagious pattern. In many cases the magnitude; of committing crime only increases for somebody. Such criminals are not correctable in any way. Death sentence is the only option for them.

Conclusion: considering the pros and cons of the death sentence, it seems to me that, there should be death sentence to certain crimes. Suppose a serial killer who murders one after another and at last is caught cannot get any sympathy. Similarly, a person who sets fire to a hospital full of innocent injured people is a threat for any society. People who are guilty of war crimes by committing rape, arson, and genocide have no right to forgiveness. Then are hardened people with no chance of rehabilitation. They are incorrigibles. Death sentence is the only suitable punishment for them.

Debate on nuclear

Debate on nuclear technology

Introduction: Nuclear technology is a matter of concern in the present world. Many people consider it as a threat for the whole humankind. In fact, this concern is not baseless. Over the last sixty years, after the invention of nuclear technology, people of this world have been in constant fear. This threat was the highest during the cold war eras when there was a high degree of enmity and competition between the USA and the USSR.

Threat of Nuclear Technology: The devastation power of the nuclear technology startled the world during the Second World War when two Japanese cities were smashed to dust by only two nuclear bombs. Even only, a few years ago, some accidents in nuclear power plants in Russia have left thousands of people dead and disabled. Such incidents do not let the people of the world remain assured that similar things will not happen in future. Moreover , there is every possibility, considering the spread of this technology among many countries, that this technology may fall in the hands of some inconsiderate dictators like Hitler o terrorists who will not hesitate to use it against innocent people for their own purposes, hatred of vengeance . If such things ever happen, there will be irreparable loss. It is a well-known fact that the number of nuclear bombs in the stock of nuclear powers can destroy this world many times. Hence, we cannot but be concerned about the threat of nuclear technology. Furthermore, nuclear technology is very costly requiring huge amount of money for its production and maintenance. It has also stimulated anti-nuclear technology requiring even more money. There is no doubt that if the money that has already been used for producing nuclear bombs and developing anti-nuclear technology as a measure against them could be used for human welfare, the world would be a batter place for living.

Prospect of Nuclear Technology: There are some practical positive aspects of nuclear technology as well. Nuclear technology can provide us with cheap energy, which can substitute natural oil in producing electricity. Such power is already being used for such purposes in many countries including France. Nuclear technology is also being used in running submarines and for medical purposes, such as, in the treatment, we think about the fact that the reserve of natural oil and gas in this world is going to depleted within the next few decades and nuclear energy can ably replace the necessity of natural oil.

Conclusion: Considering all the above facts, it should not be exaggeration to say that, the dangers of nuclear technology outweigh its benefits. This technology can be beneficial to the humankind only if used is a very controlled way and under perfect situation. But, in these imperfect worlds we cannot expect such perfect condition and there is no way we can support nuclear technology.

Town life vs Village life

Town life VS. Village life

Introduction: It is a matter of debate whether village of towns are better as a place for living because some people prefer towns for living and some others like villages. Such preference largely depends on one’s background, lifestyle, education, and employment.

Advantages of Village life: Those who prefer village life have some specific reasons. Firstly, the density of population is low in villages. Hence, villages are usually calm and serene. Those who live quiet must love villages. 
Secondly, the village air is fresh and less polluted than that of towns because fewer ply in the village roads and there are fewer factories in rural areas. Thirdly, most of the agricultural products are produced in the villages. As a result, fresh fruits and vegetables are available in villages. Fourthly, rural areas are more scenic than the towns. The village greenery and natural beauty are always enjoyable. At last, living in villages is less costly than living in towns.

Advantages of Town life: On the other hand, many people prefer towns to villages. The reasons are better job facilities, entertainment, cultural life, communication, security, education, transport, and utilities. The government of every country spends proportionately more money for the towns than the villages. Besides, the leaders and decision-makers of a country live in towns. Such factors result in better communication, transport, utilities, education, and security. Moreover, most of the government institutions big industries and officers are situated in towns. Those organizations employ the major portion of the employees of a certain country.

Conclusion: I personally believe, having considered all the above factors, that the serene lifestyle of villages is more important than all other things. Living in villages can make a man happy. People are almost forced to live in towns because of jobs and other facilities. That is why most of the elderly people, after their retirement, go to villages for living.